2026-07-21T10:45:24.707Z [calibration z-ai/glm-5.2] drought_review_1 {"verdict":"systematic_miss","missed_opportunities":[{"symbol":"TLN","move_pct":-2.9,"why_missed":"Near-3% equity drop dismissed because scanner applies a 5% crypto-scale threshold across all asset classes"},{"symbol":"AMD","move_pct":-2.36,"why_missed":"Meaningful semiconductor weakness ignored under blanket 'moves under 5%' filter"},{"symbol":"INTC","move_pct":-2.3,"why_missed":"2.3% directional equity move screened out by same 5% bar"},{"symbol":"MSFT","move_pct":2.02,"why_missed":"2% mega-cap rally dismissed; for a stock this size that is a notable directional day"},{"symbol":"SILVER","move_pct":2.05,"why_missed":"Commodity move above 2% ignored because scanner was focused on crypto funding-rate logic"}],"diagnosis":"The scanner is grading every asset class against a uniform 5% threshold calibrated to crypto volatility, causing it to systematically miss 2-3% directional moves in US equities and commodities that are perfectly tradeable at those scales. It also leans on crypto-specific signals (flat funding rates) as a blanket filter across all markets and repeats near-identical 'low-vol consolidation' reasoning across consecutive scans without genuinely re-evaluating each class on its own terms.","scanner_guidance":"Treat any US equity or commodity move of 1.5% or greater with range exceeding 2% as a candidate directional setup — do not apply a 5% crypto-volatility threshold to non-crypto classes. Evaluate each asset class using class-appropriate signals: use funding rates only for crypto, use price/volume action for equities and commodities. When the same 'no setup' reasoning repeats for three consecutive scans, force a fresh re-evaluation of each class independently rather than copying the prior conclusion.","_served_by":"z-ai/glm-5.2"}